Call For a Consultation (305) 373-4400

Whether you’ve been convicted of a crime or have no knowledge of illegal activity, your assets, including money and property, may be vulnerable to federal forfeiture. In such situations, you need the help of an experienced Miami asset seizure & federal forfeiture defense lawyer to protect your rights and push back against the unjust seizure of your assets.
At Law Offices of Barry M. Wax, we focus on your defense with personalized attention and decades of experience in South Florida. Protect your rights—contact us today for legal support.
Our team regularly handles asset seizure cases in the very courts where these matters are decided, including the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Courthouse. That familiarity matters.
In 2025, the U.S. Marshals Service reported that it was managing 24,179 seized assets at a value of $8.2 billion.
Federal forfeiture, or asset forfeiture, is a legal process of seizing assets and property that were gained through criminal activity, used in conducting unlawful acts, or purchased with funds stemming from illegal conduct. The primary goal of this procedure is to forfeit or deprive offenders of the proceeds of their crimes.
Forfeiture also serves to disrupt and financially weaken the infrastructure of organized crime syndicates, enterprises, drug cartels, etc. Additionally, government and law enforcement agencies can use the seizure of ill-gotten gains and property to compensate victims of illegal activity and further efforts to deter crime. There are three main forms of federal forfeiture:
This type of forfeiture requires a criminal conviction and is included within the defendant’s sentencing. Criminal forfeiture is typically limited to the defendant’s property involved in the particular charges for which they were convicted.The judge may order the forfeiture of a specific asset related to the indictment, a lump sum of money as a penalty, or other property to act as a substitute forfeit.
This forfeiture applies to property that is suspected of being derived from or used to fulfill unlawful acts rather than a person charged with or convicted of a crime. No criminal conviction is required for this proceeding, but the prosecution must provide evidence of how the property is linked to a crime.Civil forfeiture allows federal agencies to file against property that is otherwise unreachable through criminal forfeiture, such as assets belonging to fugitives, terrorists, and other criminals not located within the country.
This type of forfeiture is also filed against property rather than against a person, meaning the assets in question are effectively the defendant. Administrative forfeiture allows personal property to be forfeited without the need to file a federal case.
The forfeiture process occurs before the agency that seized the assets, and there must be probable cause. This can only take place when no party has filed a claim contesting the basis of the seizure. One benefit is that the use of court resources is avoided when no one denies the forfeiture.
Federal asset forfeiture begins with the government asserting that certain properties were used to conduct a crime, were proceeds from a crime, or were purchased through ill-gotten funds. This may be during a criminal trial concerning federal offenses, such as fraud, embezzlement, counterfeiting, or drug smuggling.
Government agencies may even suspect property belonging to a non-convicted person as being obtained from illegal means. If they’re proven correct or if probable cause is presented in an uncontested forfeiture, the government can seize the property.
The types of forfeiture include criminal, civil judicial, and administrative. Criminal forfeiture follows a conviction and is included in the defendant’s sentencing. Civil and administrative forfeiture is against the property itself rather than the owner.
The non-convicted property owner may have avoided conviction in a previous trial or was never suspected of a crime. Criminal and civil forfeiture requires the prosecution to provide proof in court, while administrative proceedings only need probable cause and forgo the federal court’s involvement.
In a forfeiture proceeding in the United States, the burden of proof is the obligation of the federal prosecutor to show how assets were illegally acquired, purchased with unlawful proceeds, or used to commit criminal acts.
Sometimes, the burden of proof falls on the owner of the identified property to show that the money or property was not knowingly ill-gotten or used. In some cases, the federal court may decide that the property is forfeited due to illegal conduct, even without a criminal conviction.
Federal and state government agencies aim to seize property through forfeiture proceedings to punish convicted criminals by reducing the profits gained through their criminal acts, to disrupt and weaken organized crime syndicates, and to use the seized property to compensate victims and fund further government efforts to eliminate federal criminal activity.
It is possible for a qualified and experienced lawyer familiar with forfeiture and seizure proceedings to represent you, advocate for your rights, and present a strong case arguing your lawful right to certain properties. The federal prosecutor has the burden of proof and must reasonably establish how an asset was earned through illegal conduct, used in order to commit a crime, or purchased using ill-gotten money.
However, the prosecution’s burden of proof within a civil forfeiture case tends to be much lower than during criminal forfeiture proceedings. The burden of proof may be effectively left to the defendant, whose legal representation must provide evidence showing how the property owner has a valid claim to the assets subject to forfeiture.
Furthermore, the federal courts may decide the property is forfeited due to unlawful activity, even if a criminal conviction cannot be secured by the prosecutor. Such instances tend to be controversial, as the defendant party is punished by losing their property without a criminal trial to prove illegal involvement.
Your forfeiture attorney can advocate for your rights by arguing you had no knowledge of criminal activity taking place, demonstrating that the property was not involved in illegal conduct, or employing other valid defense arguments.
When the government seizes money or property, the most important thing to understand is that the government still must follow the law, and in many situations, it makes mistakes that can be challenged. Our Miami asset seizure & federal forfeiture defense attorneys focus on identifying those mistakes and building realistic federal forfeiture defense strategies to recover property as quickly as possible.
Under federal law, particularly 18 U.S.C. § 983 (CAFRA), the government must meet strict deadlines and ultimately prove its case. Florida law, including Chapter 932 of the Florida Statutes, also requires probable cause and proper notice before property can be permanently taken.
In practice, a Miami asset seizure & federal forfeiture defense attorney usually starts by breaking down how the seizure happened in the first place, and some of the most common ways to push back include:
An effective federal forfeiture defense strategy also includes pushing for early hearings, so the government is forced to justify why it’s still holding on to the property. In many asset seizure cases, delays work in the government’s favor, so acting quickly with the help of Barry M. Wax can make a real difference.
In asset seizure cases, one of the first and most important steps is figuring out what type of forfeiture the government is using. Civil and criminal forfeiture are very different, and that difference can have a direct hand in shaping the defense strategy. Our Miami asset seizure & federal forfeiture defense attorneys need to quickly identify the process to build the right federal forfeiture defense strategy.
Civil forfeiture is the most common, and it’s brought against the property itself, not the person. In addition, civil forfeiture doesn’t require a criminal conviction. Instead, the government needs to show a connection between the property and the alleged unlawful activity. Since the burden of proof is lower, civil forfeiture cases in asset seizure cases move quickly and aggressively.
Criminal forfeiture is different, as it only applies after a criminal conviction as part of the sentencing.
In some situations, both civil and criminal forfeiture can proceed at the same time, which is particularly common in complicated asset seizure cases involving multiple agencies.
A strong federal forfeiture defense strategy depends on recognizing which system applies and responding accordingly. At Law Offices of Barry M. Wax, we help clients in asset seizure cases to identify the correct framework early on so the proper federal forfeiture defense strategy can be used from day one.
When property is seized, the impact is immediate, and in asset seizure cases, protecting your property requires fast action and a focused legal response. Our Miami asset seizure & federal forfeiture defense attorneys work to secure emergency relief while building a long-term federal forfeiture defense strategy.
Federal law protects some key protections, including the innocent owner defense under 18 U.S.C. § 983(d), which gives owners the opportunity to show that they weren’t involved in any alleged wrongdoing.
Whether you meet the criteria to launch an 18 U.S.C. § 983(d) defense or not, documentation is critical in most asset seizure cases, and our Miami asset seizure & federal forfeiture defense attorneys focus on proving lawful ownership through records like:
At Law Offices of Barry M. Wax, we work to quickly restore access to operating and personal funds as quickly as possible by organizing the evidence and challenging improper seizures with a targeted federal forfeiture defense strategy.
A: Immediately after an asset is seized in Miami, law enforcement typically sends out a notice of seizure that explains the legal basis for the action. It’s important to note that the owner might only have a limited amount of time to respond to that notice or file a claim. This makes an early review of all documentation essential, as missing deadlines can result in the permanent loss of property, even without a criminal conviction.
A: You can recover money taken from your bank account in a seizure, but it requires proving lawful ownership and lack of connection to any alleged illegal activity. Banks often comply with federal or state orders and freeze accounts without warning. Challenging the seizure requires legal filings and sometimes hearings.
A: You don’t need to be charged with a crime for assets to be seized. In civil forfeiture proceedings, you don’t need to be criminally convicted to lose your assets. Law enforcement can seize property based on their suspicion of your involvement in unlawful activity. This means you could lose access to your property even without being arrested or indicted.
A: There’s no typical amount of time when it comes to how long asset seizure cases take to resolve. Resolution times vary widely, depending on how complicated the case is, which agencies are involved, and whether litigation is contested. Some cases could be resolved within a few weeks, while others could take several months to years in federal court.
When it’s time to hire an asset seizure & federal forfeiture defense lawyer, the federal criminal defense team at Law Offices of Barry M. Wax understands that convicted defendants and accused clients alike are vulnerable to unfair legal proceedings.
At Law Offices of Barry M. Wax, our team understands how local judges approach forfeiture issues, how federal and state prosecutors handle these claims, and what procedural strategies are most effective in this region.
Let a qualified and experienced defense attorney represent your case and advocate to protect your rights. Contact our offices today to schedule a consultation.
Copyright © 2026 Law Offices of Barry M. Wax. All rights reserved.